Leaf energy balance equations
Based on the following paper: Schymanski, S.J. and Or, D. (2016): Leaf-scale experiments reveal important omission in the Penman-Monteith equation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, p.1–33. doi: 10.5194/hess-2016-363.
Author: Stan Schymanski ([email protected])
Note: This worksheet is prepared for the open source software sage. It relies on definitions provided in Worksheet Worksheet_setup.
Definition of variables
All variables are also listed in a Table at the end of this document.
Mathematical derivations
Leaf energy balance
The material below follows closely derivations published previously \citep{schymanski_stomatal_2013}, with re-organisation of equations for greater consistence with the present paper.
The leaf energy balance is determined by the dominant energy fluxes between the leaf and its surroundings, including radiative, sensible, and latent energy exchange (linked to mass exchange).
In this study we focus on steady-state conditions, in which the energy balance can be written as:
{eq_Rs_enbal}
where absorbed short wave radiation, is the net longwave balance, i.e. the emitted minus the absorbed, is the sensible heat flux away from the leaf and is the latent heat flux away from the leaf. In the above, extensive variables are defined per unit leaf area. Following our previous work \citep{schymanski_stomatal_2013}, this study considers spatially homogeneous planar leaves, i.e. homogenous illumination and a negligible temperature gradient between the two sides of the leaf. The net longwave emission is represented by the difference between blackbody radiation at leaf temperature () and that at the temperature of the surrounding objects () \citep{Monteith_principles_2007}:
{eq_Rll}
where is the fraction of projected leaf area exchanging radiative and sensible heat (2 for a planar leaf, 1 for a soil surface), is the leaf's longwave emmissivity () and is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Total convective heat transport away from the leaf is represented as:
{eq_Hl}
where is the average one-sided convective heat transfer coefficient, determined by properties of the leaf boundary layer.
Latent heat flux (, W~m) is directly related to the transpiration rate () by:
{eq_El}
where is the molar mass of water and the latent heat of vaporisation. (mol~m~s) was computed in molar units as a function of the concentration of water vapour within the leaf (, mol m) and in the free air (, mol m) \citep[Eq. 6.8]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_Elmol}
where (m~s) is the total leaf conductance for water vapour, dependent on stomatal () and boundary layer conductance () in the following way:
{eq_gtw}
Boundary layer conductance to water vapour
The total leaf conductance to water vapour is determined by the boundary layer and stomatal conductances and equal to 1 over the sum of their respectife resistances (. The boundary layer conductance for water vapour is equivalent to the mass transfer coefficient for a wet surface \cite[Eq. 7.41]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_gbw}
where is the dimensionless Sherwood number and is the diffusivity of water vapour in air. If the convection coefficient for heat is known, the one for mass () can readily be calculated from the relation \cite[Eq. 6.60]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_gbw_hc}
where is the fraction of one-sided transpiring surface area in relation to the surface area for sensible heat exchange, is the constant-pressure heat capacity of air, is an empirical constant ( for general purposes) and is the dimensionless Lewis number, defined as \cite[Eq. 6.57]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_Le}
where is the thermal diffusivity of air. The value of was set to 1 for leaves with stomata on one side only, and to 2 for stomata on both sides. Other values could be used for leaves only partly covered by stomata.
Effect of leaf temperature on the leaf-air vapour concentration gradient
\label{sec_Tleaf} The concentration difference in Eq. eq_Elmol is a function of the temperature and the vapour pressure differences between the leaf and the free air. Assuming that water vapour behaves like an ideal gas, we can express its concentration as:
{eq_Cwl}
where is the vapour pressure inside the leaf, is the universal gas constant and is leaf temperature. A similar relation holds for the vapour concentration in free air, . In this study the vapour pressure inside the leaf is assumed to be the saturation vapour pressure at leaf temperature, which is computed using the Clausius-Clapeyron relation \citep[Eq. B.3]{hartmann_global_1994}:
{eq_Pwl}
where is the latent heat of vaporisation and is the molar mass of water.
Note that the dependence of the leaf-air water concentration difference () in Eq. eq_Cwl is very sensitive to leaf temperature. For example if the leaf temperature increases by 5K relative to air temperature, would double, while if leaf temperature decreased by 6K, would go to 0 at 70% relative humidity.
Concentration or vapour pressure gradient driving transpiration?
Note that is commonly expressed as a function of the vapour pressure difference between the free air () and the leaf (), in which the conductance () is expressed in molar units (mol~m~s):
{eq_Elmol_conv}
For , Eq. eq_Elmol can still give a flux, whereas Eq. eq_Elmol_conv gives zero flux. This is because the concentrations of vapour in air (mol~m) can differ due to differences in tempertaure, even if the partial vapour pressures are the same (see Eq. eq_Cwl). Therefore, the relation between and has an asymptote at the equivalent temperature. It can be obtained by combining Eqs. eq_Elmol and eq_Elmol_conv and solving for :
{eq_gtwmol_gtw}
For , the relation simplifies to:
{eq_gtwmol_gtw_iso}
which, for typical values of and amounts to ~mol~m. For all practical purposes, we found that Eqs. eq_Elmol and eq_Elmol_conv with give similar results when plotted as functions of leaf temperature.
Model closure
Given climatic forcing as , , , and , and leaf-specific parameters , , and , we need to compute , , and a series of other derived variables, as described below.
The vapour concentration in the free air can be computed from vapour pressure analogously to Eq. eq_Cwl:
{eq_Cwa}
The heat transfer coefficient () for a flat plate can be determined using the non-dimensional Nusselt number ():
{eq_hc}
where is the thermal conductivity of the air in the boundary layer and is a characteristic length scale of the leaf.
For sufficiently high wind speeds, inertial forces drive the convective heat transport (forced convection) and the relevant dimensionless number is the Reynolds number (), which defines the balance between inertial and viscous forces \cite[Eq. 6.41]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_Re}
where is the wind velocity (m s), is the kinematic viscosity of the air and is taken as the length of the leaf in wind direction.
In the absence of wind, buoyancy forces, driven by the density gradient between the air at the surface of the leaf and the free air dominate convective heat exchange (free'' or
natural convection''). The relevant dimensionless number here is the Grashof number (), which defines the balance between buoyancy and viscous forces \cite[Eqs. 9.3 and 9.65]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}:
{eq_Gr}
where is gravity, while and are the densities of the gas in the atmosphere and at the leaf surface respectively.
For , forced convection is dominant and free convection can be neglected, whereas for free convection is dominant and forced convection can be neglected \cite[P. 565]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}. For simplicity, the analysis is limited to forced conditions, which is satisfied by considering wind speeds greater than 0.5~m~s for cm leaves. %See leaf_chamber4.sws or leaf_capacitance_steady_state3.sws.
The average Nusselt number under forced convection was calculated as a function of the average Reynolds number and a critical Reynolds number () that determines the onset of turbulence and depends on the level of turbulence in the free air stream or leaf surface properties \cite[P. 412]{incropera_fundamentals_2006}
{eq_Nu_forced_all}
with
{eq_C1}
and
{eq_C2}
Eq. eq_C2 was introduced to make Eq. eq_Nu_forced_all valid for all Reynolds numbers, and following considerations explained in our previous work \citep{schymanski_stomatal_2013}, we chose in the present simulations.
Thermodynamic variables
In order to simulate steady state leaf temperatures and the leaf energy balance terms using the above equations, it is necessary to calculate , , , , and , while , and are input parameters, and and (vapour pressure and wind speed) are part of the environmental forcing. , , and were parameterised as functions of air temperature () only, by fitting linear curves to published data \cite[Table A.3]{Monteith_principles_2007}:
{eq_Dwa}
{eq_alphaa}
{eq_ka}
{eq_nua}
Assuming that air and water vapour behave like an ideal gas, and that dry air is composed of 79% N and 21% O, we calculated air density as a function of temperature, vapour pressure and the partial pressures of the other two components using the ideal gas law:
{eq_rhoa_Pa_Ta}
where is the amount of matter (mol), is the molar mass (kg~mol), the pressure, the temperature and the molar universal gas constant. This equation was used for each component, i.e. water vapour, N and O, where the partial pressures of N and O are calculated from atmospheric pressure minus vapour pressure, yielding:
{eq_rhoa_Pwa_Ta}
where and are the molar masses of nitrogen and oxygen respectively, while and are their partial pressures, calculated as:
{eq_PN2}
and
{eq_PO2}
Example calculations
Below, we create a copy of cdict, which is a dictionary with general constants, generated during the definition of variables at the top of the worksheet, and some example values for external forcing and leaf properties needed to compute steady-state fluxes and leaf temperature:
Now, we compute all derived variables, using the equations described above.
Now, we have a dictionary with , and as functions of leaf temperature () only. At steady state, eq_Rs_enbal must be satisfied, so we will substitute the above dictionary into eq_Rs_enbal, subtract and do a numerical search for the root of the equation to obtain steady-state leaf temperature:
Below, we define a function that performs all the above calculations given a dictionary with the instantaneous forcing:
Calculation using known
If leaf temperature () is known (e.g. measured), but stomatal conductance is not known, we can still calculate and , and then obtain from the energy balance equation:
Saving definitions to separate file
In the below, we save the definitions and variables to separate files in the /temp directory, one with the extension .sage, from which we can selectively load functions using %load fun_name filenam.sage
and one with the extension .sobj, to be loaded elsewhere using load_session()
Table of symbols
Variable | Description (value) | Units |
---|---|---|
Fraction of one-sided leaf area covered by stomata (1 if stomata are on one side only, 2 if they are on both sides) | 1 | |
Fraction of projected area exchanging sensible heat with the air (2) | 1 | |
Thermal diffusivity of dry air | m s | |
Specific heat of dry air (1010) | J K kg | |
Concentration of water in the free air | mol m | |
Concentration of water in the leaf air space | mol m | |
Binary diffusion coefficient of water vapour in air | m s | |
Latent heat flux from leaf | J m s | |
Transpiration rate in molar units | mol m s | |
Longwave emmissivity of the leaf surface (1.0) | 1 | |
Gravitational acceleration (9.81) | m s | |
Boundary layer conductance to water vapour | m s | |
Boundary layer conductance to water vapour | mol m s | |
Stomatal conductance to water vapour | m s | |
Stomatal conductance to water vapour | mol m s | |
Total leaf conductance to water vapour | m s | |
Total leaf layer conductance to water vapour | mol m s | |
Average 1-sided convective transfer coefficient | J K m s | |
Sensible heat flux from leaf | J m s | |
Thermal conductivity of dry air | J K m s | |
Characteristic length scale for convection (size of leaf) | m | |
Latent heat of evaporation (2.45e6) | J kg | |
Molar mass of nitrogen (0.028) | kg mol | |
Molar mass of oxygen (0.032) | kg mol | |
Molar mass of water (0.018) | kg mol | |
Grashof number | 1 | |
Lewis number | 1 | |
Nusselt number | 1 | |
Critical Reynolds number for the onset of turbulence | 1 | |
Reynolds number | 1 | |
Sherwood number | 1 | |
Kinematic viscosity of dry air | m s | |
Air pressure | Pa | |
Partial pressure of nitrogen in the atmosphere | Pa | |
Partial pressure of oxygen in the atmosphere | Pa | |
Vapour pressure in the atmosphere | Pa | |
Saturation vapour pressure at air temperature | Pa | |
Vapour pressure inside the leaf | Pa | |
Prandtl number (0.71) | 1 | |
Boundary layer resistance to water vapour, inverse of | s m | |
Longwave radiation away from leaf | J m s | |
Molar gas constant (8.314472) | J K mol | |
Solar shortwave flux | J m s | |
Stomatal resistance to water vapour, inverse of | s m | |
Total leaf resistance to water vapour, | s m | |
Density of dry air | kg m | |
Density of air at the leaf surface | kg m | |
Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67e-8) | J K m s | |
Air temperature | K | |
Leaf temperature | K | |
Radiative temperature of objects surrounding the leaf | K | |
Wind velocity | m s |