Newton's Second Law in Polar Coordinates
PY345
Derivation of Newton's Second Law in Polar Coordinates
In cartesian coordinates
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 108: …dot{x}\hat{x}+x\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\dot{\hat{x…
.
In polar coordinates,
,
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \enclose at position 31: …dot{r}\hat{r}+r\̲e̲n̲c̲l̲o̲s̲e̲{circle}{\dot{\… not zero.
As the position of an object changes in polar coordinates, the direction of changes to always point toward the object. Therefore . To determine what it is, imagine a point moving along a unit circle from to .
The change in position has a length of and points in the direction (counterclockwise, though technically it only points exactly in the direction when approaches zero).
Therefore,
.
Now we can evaluate and in polar coordinates.
We are not done yet, though, because now we have to figure out what is. To do that, let's imagine a point moving along a unit circle again.
It may not be obvious how was determined in this figure, so let's move so that its tail touches that of .
You can see that the two vectors are parallel, which means that they are the same vector (recall that vectors are determined by length and orientation, not by where they start and end). You may also notice that those two triangles are similar triangles, which means that the angle between and is . Lastly, when drawn from the midpoint of the arc, points toward the center of the circle. Therefore,
.
Putting it all together,
.
From this we can write Newton's Second Law in polar coordinates (cylindrical coordinates for three dimensions).
Practice
Determine expressions for the acceleration of the puck in polar coordinates.
Solution
Assumptions
the puck and the block are point masses
there is no friction between the puck and the table
there is no friction between the string and the table
Diagrams
Analysis
According to Newton's Second Law in polar coordinates
and
.
There are no forces in the -direction. There are, however, forces in the and -directions. First, let's look at the puck.
radial direction:
-direction:
z-direction: ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 20: …p}^n-F_{ep}^g=m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{\ddot{z}}{0}
For the hanging block,
.
Note that because if the hanging block accelerates upward then the puck accelerates outward. This allows us to combine equations since we also know that the tensions are the same.
From the -direction, we can solve for .
Check
The SI units of are , which is what we expect. The SI units of are , which is also what we expect.
One special case is when , in which we would expect that the block would be pretty much in free fall. If that is the case, then any terms with are negligible.
Another special case is when , in which this should reduce to the Half Atwood machine discussed previously.
Interpretation
We can see that the puck is more likely to accelerate outward if it is spinning around very fast. We also see that it is more likely to accelerate inward if the hanging block is very heavy.
The equation for shows us that it depends on . That is, the rate at which the puck swings around depends on how the puck is moving inward or outward.
Practice
A skateboard of mass is on a semicircular half-pipe with radius . Determine an expression for .
Solution
Assumptions
the skateboard rolls without friction
the skateboard starts from rest at an angle
air resistance is negligible
Diagrams
Analysis
Newton's Laws in Polar Coordinates are
Applying these to the free body diagram we get,
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 21: …s\phi-F_{hs}^n=\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{m\ddot{r}}-… (r-coordinate is constant)
for the r-direction and
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 32: …\phi=\cancel{m}\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{R}{r}\ddot{\ph…
in the -direction. This does not have any obvious solutions. One option is to determine the resulting motion numerically, which we will do soon. Another option is to make another assumption about the motion, e.g. that is always small. If , then
.
For what function do you get the same thing back with a negative sign after differentiating it twice? Sine and Cosine.
Let's check that this does in fact satisfy . Let for brevity.
It works, so now let's use the initial conditions ( and ) to determine the constants A and B.
Therefore,
.
Check
The units of are , so the argument of the cosine function has no units. Whatever the units of will also be the units of .
Let's check some limits to see if the answer makes sense. If this were to happen in the absence of gravity (i.e. ), then , which makes sense. You also get that same result if , which corresponds to a completely flat halfpipe.
Interpretation
Our answer indicates to us that the skateboard oscillates back and forth, which makes sense. It also tells us that the frequency of the oscillation depends on the strength of gravity and the size of the halfpipe.
Practice
A puck connected to a string swings in a circle on a rough, horizontal table. Determine an expression for the angle of the string as a function of time.
Solution
Assumptions
the puck is a point mass with mass
the string has no mass
the puck starts at with an initial angular speed
the coefficient of kinetic friction is
the puck is moving fast enough to be sliding
Diagrams
Analysis
According to the free body diagrams, the equations for Newton's Second Law are
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 38: …\dot{\phi}^2)=m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\ddot{r}}-m…
in the r-direction,
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 62: …r\ddot{\phi}+2m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\dot{r}}\do…
in the -direction, and
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 20: …p}^n-F_{ep}^g=m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\ddot{z}}\R…
in the z-direction. Combining the z-equation with the -equation, we get
.
We integrate to find .
Repeat to find .
Notice that we didn't even have to use the equation for the r-direction. All that would do is tell us the tension in the string (which we could do now that we know ).
Check
The units of are , which cancel out completely. The same is true for the second terms. This may seem wrong since we are expecting an angle, but radians is a unit that doesn't really count as a unit in the normal sense, so this is actually fine.
In the limits and/or , the first terms goes away. This makes the puck continue to go around without slowing down, which makes sense.
Interpretation
The fact that the first term is negative and the others are positive means that at some point the puck will stop and start to move in the opposite direction. This unphysical scenario occurs when
.
After this point, our model breaks down because the kinetic friction force would disappear.
Solution
Assumptions
Einstein is a point mass with mass
the table is turning fast enough that Einstein is not moving vertically
the coefficient of static friction between Einstein and the wall is
Einstein stays at a constant distance from the center of the disk
the table turns at a constant rate
Diagrams
One unusual aspect of this situation is that the static friction force points upward (what would happen if the wall were slippery?) whereas the normal force points inward.
Analysis
According to the free body diagram, the equations for Newton's Second Law are
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 59: …row -F_{wE}^n=m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\ddot{r}}-m…
in the r-direction,
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 64: …r\ddot{\phi}=-2\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\dot{r}}\do…
in the -direction, and
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \cancelto at position 20: …E}^s-F_{eE}^g=m\̲c̲a̲n̲c̲e̲l̲t̲o̲{0}{\ddot{z}}\R…
in the z-direction.
The -direction equation just confirms that the table will turn at a constant speed (since ). Since for static friction, the equation for the r-direction becomes
Check
The units of the right hand side are , which is the proper unit for an angular speed.
If is really big, then must be large in order to keep Einstein up against the wall, which makes sense. Also, if , the table doesn't need to spin at all to keep him up.
Interpretation
The main limitation of this analysis is that it doesn't apply for turning speeds that are small enough that Einstein would fall.