Kernel: SageMath 9.1
This notebook is the data analysis I did for this post.
Castillo et al
Of 50 patients treated with calcifediol, one required admission to the ICU (2%), while of 26 untreated patients, 13 required admission (50 %)
In [1]:
0.0400000000000000
In [2]:
In [3]:
In [4]:
In [5]:
0.202486777043982
9.43869427378229e-6
4.26534636264292e-12
4.44089209850063e-14
2.79734395057776e-16
1.18329135783152e-28
8.43769498715155e-63
In [6]:
In [7]:
0.999953388271731
0.0000466117069850912
2.10638324622593e-11
2.19307411855358e-13
1.38143023577983e-15
5.84352331470649e-28
4.16684082525198e-62
Well, that's decisive
In [8]:
In [9]:
In [10]:
8.30296275867362e-8
1.80527874248038e-7
0.999999819472126
0.999999267348029
0.999830190538604
0.715973398225514
In [11]:
In [12]:
8.27504631854543e-8
2.16833411622758e-7
0.999999783166588
0.999999265181577
0.999817480443293
0.717983321315720
Assuming the study's data is correct, Calcifediol certainly reduces ICU rates by at least 50% (a relative reduction). And it probably reduces ICU rates by at least 90%.
In [13]:
The graph shows that the control group's ICU rate is somewhere around 50%, but it could be anywhere in the bell curve, like 60% or 40%. But the experimental group's ICU rate is only a few percent.
In [0]: